top of page

Part 2: Cannabis vs. Deregulation

Introduction

While opposing cannabis legalization, several Republican legislators have supported deregulation efforts in industries like agriculture, finance, and manufacturing. This raises the question: Why is cannabis excluded from similar deregulatory policies that promote growth and entrepreneurship?

Key Examples

1. Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD): Opposed cannabis reform but supported the "Reducing Regulatory Burdens Act," which relaxed pesticide regulations, potentially increasing public health risks.

2. Rep. Pete Sessions (R-TX): Blocked cannabis banking protections while supporting financial deregulation in the "Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act."

3. Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL): Advocated for professional deregulation in Florida, citing the need to promote small business growth, yet opposes cannabis businesses on moral grounds.

Analysis

These positions highlight inconsistencies in the application of conservative principles. Deregulating cannabis could empower entrepreneurs, create jobs, and generate billions in tax revenue. Why does this logic apply to finance and agriculture but not to cannabis?

Conclusion

If Republican lawmakers apply their deregulatory approach consistently, cannabis legalization becomes not just logical but inevitable.

Comments


  • facebook
  • twitter
  • instagram

©2025 by Watershed Rolling Paper

bottom of page